Mission Intelligence Platform

Vendor decisions
at orbital velocity.

Compare propulsion vendors, telemetry platforms, and launch providers on the metrics that determine mission success — delta-v, cost-per-kg to LEO, uptime SLA, integration timeline. The tool is live. Start comparing.

LIVE COMPARISON ENGINE · v2.4.1
Δ-v Budget
3,200vs3,600
Cost / kg to LEO
$5,800vs$5,200
Uptime SLA
98.2%vs98.8%
Integration
14wvs12w
COMPOSITE SCORE
46.7
60.1
Isar Aerospace leads on this configuration

Full PDF + API access unlocked after waitlist signup

847Comparisons run
32Vendors indexed
18Missions validated
ORBITAL DYNAMICS · LIVE
Astra
Isar
INCLINATION53.2°SSO
ALTITUDE550 kmLEO
PERIOD95.4 minNominal
EPOCH2026-02-25UTC

Orbital parameters update as you change vendor inputs. The visualization reflects real mission profiles from our validated dataset of 18 confirmed launches.

SCROLL
847 COMPARISONS GENERATED·
DELTA-V BENCHMARKS UPDATED Q1 2026·
18 VALIDATED MISSION PROFILES·
SERIES A INTELLIGENCE LAYER·
PROCUREMENT GRADE SCORING·
API ACCESS COMING Q2 2026·
32 VENDORS INDEXED·
LEO · MEO · GEO COVERAGE·
847 COMPARISONS GENERATED·
DELTA-V BENCHMARKS UPDATED Q1 2026·
18 VALIDATED MISSION PROFILES·
SERIES A INTELLIGENCE LAYER·
PROCUREMENT GRADE SCORING·
API ACCESS COMING Q2 2026·
32 VENDORS INDEXED·
LEO · MEO · GEO COVERAGE·
DATA
Section 02 · Methodology

Numbers that
don't lie.

Every data point in the comparison engine is traceable to a primary source. No vendor-submitted benchmarks. No synthetic benchmarks. Mission-verified, procurement-grade.

18 missions

Primary Mission Telemetry

18 confirmed launches across LEO, SSO, and GTO orbits. Raw TM/TC logs processed through our normalization pipeline.

340+ contracts

Public Procurement Records

FAR/DFARS contract data, ESA tender outcomes, and commercial launch manifest filings cross-referenced quarterly.

32 vendors

Vendor Technical Disclosures

Propulsion datasheets, interface control documents, and SLA agreements from vendor qualification packages.

47 experts

Scoring Weight Derivation

Weights derived from a Delphi study with 47 mission architects across 11 agencies. Updated semi-annually.

SCORING WEIGHTS · DELPHI CONSENSUS

How mission architects rank procurement criteria

Mission Reliability35%
Cost Efficiency28%
Integration Speed22%
Technical Margin15%
VOL.III
Section 03 · Field Evidence

Decisions the
spreadsheet missed.

Three procurement decisions where Orbit surfaced the delta that changed the outcome. Names anonymized at client request.

New SpacePropulsionLEOSeries A

Rideshare LEO Cluster

Series A Startup · 12 employees

THE SITUATION

CTO needed to choose between two propulsion vendors 6 weeks before Series A demo. Internal spreadsheet showed them as equivalent.

WHAT ORBIT FOUND

Orbit surfaced a 31% cost delta on delta-v per USD — the cheaper vendor had superior Isp at target altitude.

THE OUTCOME

$2.1M saved over 3-mission contract

−31% cost deltavs buyer spreadsheet
DECISION VELOCITY
6 weeksWithout Orbit
4 daysWith Orbit
"

The comparison surfaced a data point our team had missed in six weeks of analysis. We walked into the board meeting with confidence.

New Space CLIENT, PROPULSION

Mission Manifest · Open

Your trajectory
is nominal.

The comparison engine is live. Full reports, exportable PDFs, and API access unlock when we launch. Reserve your seat on the manifest — your report is already waiting.

214Seats reserved
Q2 2026Estimated launch
47Orgs on manifest
View API documentation
No vendor sponsorship
Work email only
Cancel anytime